Czechia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Czechia
110.88 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
99.32 current US$
in 2020
Czechia rank
62nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Czechia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0255075100199520072020

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 110.88 current US$ against 99.32 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 11.56 current US$.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Czechia ranks 62nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 77.42 current US$ 93.73 current US$ 16.31 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 88.57 current US$ 71.86 current US$ 16.71 current US$ Czechia
2010s 102.03 current US$ 102.78 current US$ 0.7542 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 110.88 current US$ 99.32 current US$ 11.56 current US$ Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Czechia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Czechia, at 110.88 current US$ against 99.32 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe?
11.56 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Czechia ranks 62nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/czechia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/czechia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Czechia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed