Croatia vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Croatia
86.12 current US$
in 2020
Eswatini
86.31 current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
71st
Eswatini rank
70th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Croatia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 86.31 current US$ against 86.12 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 0.19 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 71st and Eswatini ranks 70th of 149 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.68 current US$ | 56.23 current US$ | 10.55 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 57.24 current US$ | 61.45 current US$ | 4.21 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 74.06 current US$ | 75.57 current US$ | 1.51 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 86.12 current US$ | 86.31 current US$ | 0.1912 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Croatia or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 86.31 current US$ against 86.12 current US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Croatia and Eswatini?
- 0.19 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Croatia ranks 71st and Eswatini ranks 70th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.