Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Congo
739.58 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
591.31 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
11th
Zambia rank
14th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 739.58 current US$ against 591.31 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 148.27 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 14th of 149 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,056 current US$ | 550.25 current US$ | 505.55 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,023 current US$ | 582.46 current US$ | 440.72 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 748.06 current US$ | 569.46 current US$ | 178.6 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 739.58 current US$ | 591.31 current US$ | 148.27 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Congo or Zambia?
- Congo, at 739.58 current US$ against 591.31 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Congo and Zambia?
- 148.27 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Congo ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 14th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.