Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Congo
739.58 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
931.25 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
11th
Sweden rank
9th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Congo
  • Sweden
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 931.25 current US$ against 739.58 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 191.67 current US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1,056 current US$ 881.68 current US$ 174.12 current US$ Congo
2000s 1,023 current US$ 879.42 current US$ 143.76 current US$ Congo
2010s 748.06 current US$ 911.64 current US$ 163.57 current US$ Sweden
2020s 739.58 current US$ 931.25 current US$ 191.67 current US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Congo or Sweden?
Sweden, at 931.25 current US$ against 739.58 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Congo and Sweden?
191.67 current US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Congo ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/congo-rep/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/congo-rep/sweden/">Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed