China vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
China
66.16 current US$
in 2020
Georgia
69.11 current US$
in 2020
China rank
85th
Georgia rank
82nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- China
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 69.11 current US$ against 66.16 current US$ in China, a difference of 2.95 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 85th and Georgia ranks 82nd of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.78 current US$ | 42.44 current US$ | 8.34 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 55.88 current US$ | 53.22 current US$ | 2.66 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 61.23 current US$ | 63.85 current US$ | 2.61 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2020s | 66.16 current US$ | 69.11 current US$ | 2.95 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, China or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 69.11 current US$ against 66.16 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between China and Georgia?
- 2.95 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Georgia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- China ranks 85th and Georgia ranks 82nd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.