Chile vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Chile
169.03 current US$
in 2020
Slovenia
173.7 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
42nd
Slovenia rank
39th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Chile
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 173.7 current US$ against 169.03 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 4.67 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 39th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 137.05 current US$ | 97.58 current US$ | 39.47 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 160.21 current US$ | 121.62 current US$ | 38.59 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 174.46 current US$ | 151.41 current US$ | 23.05 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 169.03 current US$ | 173.7 current US$ | 4.66 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Chile or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 173.7 current US$ against 169.03 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Chile and Slovenia?
- 4.67 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Slovenia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Chile ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 39th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.