Chile vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Chile
169.03 current US$
in 2020
Mali
173.27 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
42nd
Mali rank
40th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Chile
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 173.27 current US$ against 169.03 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 4.24 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 42nd and Mali ranks 40th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 137.05 current US$ | 131.41 current US$ | 5.64 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 160.21 current US$ | 160.75 current US$ | 0.54 current US$ | Mali |
| 2010s | 174.46 current US$ | 176.85 current US$ | 2.39 current US$ | Mali |
| 2020s | 169.03 current US$ | 173.27 current US$ | 4.23 current US$ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Chile or Mali?
- Mali, at 173.27 current US$ against 169.03 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Chile and Mali?
- 4.24 current US$, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mali?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Mali rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Chile ranks 42nd and Mali ranks 40th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.