Belgium vs China: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Belgium
65.56 current US$
in 2020
China
66.16 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
86th
China rank
85th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Belgium
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 66.16 current US$ against 65.56 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 0.6 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
Belgium ranks 86th and China ranks 85th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and China in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.96 current US$ | 50.78 current US$ | 2.82 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 54.36 current US$ | 55.88 current US$ | 1.52 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 61.73 current US$ | 61.23 current US$ | 0.4911 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 65.56 current US$ | 66.16 current US$ | 0.5997 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belgium or China?
- China, at 66.16 current US$ against 65.56 current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belgium and China?
- 0.6 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and China rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Belgium ranks 86th and China ranks 85th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.