Belgium vs Chad: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Belgium
65.56 current US$
in 2020
Chad
65.51 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
86th
Chad rank
87th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Belgium
- Chad
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 65.56 current US$ against 65.51 current US$ in Chad, a difference of 0.05 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chad ahead.
Belgium ranks 86th and Chad ranks 87th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.96 current US$ | 87.57 current US$ | 39.61 current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | 54.36 current US$ | 131.22 current US$ | 76.86 current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 61.73 current US$ | 74.07 current US$ | 12.34 current US$ | Chad |
| 2020s | 65.56 current US$ | 65.51 current US$ | 0.0462 current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belgium or Chad?
- Belgium, at 65.56 current US$ against 65.51 current US$ in Chad as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belgium and Chad?
- 0.05 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chad?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Chad rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Belgium ranks 86th and Chad ranks 87th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.