Belarus vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Belarus
78.28 current US$
in 2020
Iceland
75.03 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
78th
Iceland rank
81st
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Belarus
- Iceland
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 78.28 current US$ against 75.03 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 3.25 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 78th and Iceland ranks 81st of 149 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.73 current US$ | 34.24 current US$ | 19.5 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2000s | 58.69 current US$ | 43.25 current US$ | 15.43 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 71.03 current US$ | 70.43 current US$ | 0.5937 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 78.28 current US$ | 75.03 current US$ | 3.25 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belarus or Iceland?
- Belarus, at 78.28 current US$ against 75.03 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belarus and Iceland?
- 3.25 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Belarus ranks 78th and Iceland ranks 81st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.