Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Belarus
78.28 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
79.73 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
78th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
75th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
020406080199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 79.73 current US$ against 78.28 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 1.45 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 78th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 53.73 current US$ 44.37 current US$ 9.36 current US$ Belarus
2000s 58.69 current US$ 49.71 current US$ 8.98 current US$ Belarus
2010s 71.03 current US$ 67.23 current US$ 3.79 current US$ Belarus
2020s 78.28 current US$ 79.73 current US$ 1.45 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 79.73 current US$ against 78.28 current US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
1.45 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Belarus ranks 78th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed