Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Austria
270.69 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
305.74 current US$
in 2020
Austria rank
27th
Guinea-Bissau rank
25th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Austria
  • Guinea-Bissau
0100200300400500199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 305.74 current US$ against 270.69 current US$ in Austria, a difference of 35.05 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 149 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 177.06 current US$ 453.59 current US$ 276.54 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 210.81 current US$ 425.65 current US$ 214.85 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 249.6 current US$ 332.65 current US$ 83.05 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 270.69 current US$ 305.74 current US$ 35.06 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Austria or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 305.74 current US$ against 270.69 current US$ in Austria as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Austria and Guinea-Bissau?
35.05 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Austria and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Austria ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/austria/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/austria/guinea-bissau/">Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed