Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Panama
76.14 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
94.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama rank
26th
Papua New Guinea rank
25th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 94.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama, a difference of 18.83 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 151 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 117.98 real chained 2019 US$ 189.65 real chained 2019 US$ 71.67 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 102.21 real chained 2019 US$ 147.65 real chained 2019 US$ 45.43 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ 109.56 real chained 2019 US$ 24.63 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ 94.97 real chained 2019 US$ 18.82 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 94.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
18.83 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Panama ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/panama/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/panama/papua-new-guinea/">Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.