New Zealand vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

New Zealand
904.79 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia
3,674 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
6th
Saint Lucia rank
3rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • New Zealand
  • Saint Lucia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 3,674 real chained 2019 US$ against 904.79 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 2,769 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 4.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 6th and Saint Lucia ranks 3rd of 151 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,199 real chained 2019 US$ 4,265 real chained 2019 US$ 3,066 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2000s 1,129 real chained 2019 US$ 4,011 real chained 2019 US$ 2,881 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2010s 1,015 real chained 2019 US$ 3,763 real chained 2019 US$ 2,747 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2020s 904.79 real chained 2019 US$ 3,674 real chained 2019 US$ 2,769 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, New Zealand or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 3,674 real chained 2019 US$ against 904.79 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between New Zealand and Saint Lucia?
2,769 real chained 2019 US$, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
New Zealand ranks 6th and Saint Lucia ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/new-zealand/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/new-zealand/st-lucia/">New Zealand vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.