Namibia vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Namibia
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
0.7441 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
64th
Sudan rank
63rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Namibia
  • Sudan
00.250.50.751199520072020

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.7441 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 0.7441 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 63rd of 151 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0.936 real chained 2019 US$ 0.936 real chained 2019 US$ Sudan
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7441 real chained 2019 US$ 0.7441 real chained 2019 US$ Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Namibia or Sudan?
Sudan, at 0.7441 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Namibia and Sudan?
0.7441 real chained 2019 US$, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Namibia ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 63rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/sudan/">Namibia vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.