Mexico vs Qatar: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Mexico
245.86 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Qatar
502.7 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
12th
Qatar rank
9th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Mexico
  • Qatar
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 502.7 real chained 2019 US$ against 245.86 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 256.84 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Qatar's figure about 2.0 times Mexico's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 12th and Qatar ranks 9th of 151 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 350.92 real chained 2019 US$ 2,351 real chained 2019 US$ 2,000 real chained 2019 US$ Qatar
2000s 303.37 real chained 2019 US$ 1,482 real chained 2019 US$ 1,179 real chained 2019 US$ Qatar
2010s 259.02 real chained 2019 US$ 587.91 real chained 2019 US$ 328.89 real chained 2019 US$ Qatar
2020s 245.86 real chained 2019 US$ 502.7 real chained 2019 US$ 256.85 real chained 2019 US$ Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Mexico or Qatar?
Qatar, at 502.7 real chained 2019 US$ against 245.86 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Mexico and Qatar?
256.84 real chained 2019 US$, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Qatar?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Qatar rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Mexico ranks 12th and Qatar ranks 9th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Qatar: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/qatar/">Mexico vs Qatar: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.