Malaysia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Malaysia
74.35 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama
76.14 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia rank
27th
Panama rank
26th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Malaysia
  • Panama
0255075100125199520072020

How they compare

Panama currently reports 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 1.79 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 27th and Panama ranks 26th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 118.35 real chained 2019 US$ 117.98 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3708 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2000s 98.03 real chained 2019 US$ 102.21 real chained 2019 US$ 4.18 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2010s 80.62 real chained 2019 US$ 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ 4.3 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2020s 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ 1.8 real chained 2019 US$ Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Malaysia or Panama?
Panama, at 76.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Malaysia and Panama?
1.79 real chained 2019 US$, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Panama?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malaysia and Panama rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Malaysia ranks 27th and Panama ranks 26th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/panama/">Malaysia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.