Guatemala vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Guatemala
5.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Peru
3.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
58th
Peru rank
61st

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Guatemala
  • Peru
0246810199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Peru, a difference of 2.54 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.7 times Peru's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 58th and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 9.4 real chained 2019 US$ 5.07 real chained 2019 US$ 4.33 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 7.89 real chained 2019 US$ 4.19 real chained 2019 US$ 3.69 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 6.51 real chained 2019 US$ 3.59 real chained 2019 US$ 2.92 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2020s 5.99 real chained 2019 US$ 3.45 real chained 2019 US$ 2.54 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Guatemala or Peru?
Guatemala, at 5.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Peru as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Guatemala and Peru?
2.54 real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Guatemala ranks 58th and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/peru/">Guatemala vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.