Ghana vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Ghana
73.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia
74.35 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ghana rank
28th
Malaysia rank
27th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Ghana
  • Malaysia
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ against 73.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Ghana, a difference of 1.15 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 27th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 130.4 real chained 2019 US$ 118.35 real chained 2019 US$ 12.05 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2000s 105.64 real chained 2019 US$ 98.03 real chained 2019 US$ 7.61 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2010s 83.28 real chained 2019 US$ 80.62 real chained 2019 US$ 2.65 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2020s 73.2 real chained 2019 US$ 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ 1.15 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Ghana or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 74.35 real chained 2019 US$ against 73.2 real chained 2019 US$ in Ghana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Ghana and Malaysia?
1.15 real chained 2019 US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ghana and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Ghana ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 27th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ghana/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ghana/malaysia/">Ghana vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.