Ecuador vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Ecuador
176.35 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Oman
161.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Oman rank
16th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Ecuador
  • Oman
100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ against 161.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Oman, a difference of 14.98 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Oman ahead.

Ecuador ranks 13th and Oman ranks 16th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 270.62 real chained 2019 US$ 396.44 real chained 2019 US$ 125.82 real chained 2019 US$ Oman
2000s 229.78 real chained 2019 US$ 287.4 real chained 2019 US$ 57.62 real chained 2019 US$ Oman
2010s 190.78 real chained 2019 US$ 164.63 real chained 2019 US$ 26.16 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ 161.37 real chained 2019 US$ 14.98 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Ecuador or Oman?
Ecuador, at 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ against 161.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Oman as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Ecuador and Oman?
14.98 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Oman rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Ecuador ranks 13th and Oman ranks 16th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/oman/">Ecuador vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.