Ecuador vs Guyana: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Ecuador
176.35 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guyana
354.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Guyana rank
11th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Ecuador
  • Guyana
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 354.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 178.03 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guyana's figure about 2.0 times Ecuador's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 13th and Guyana ranks 11th of 151 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Guyana Difference Ahead
1990s 270.62 real chained 2019 US$ 379.7 real chained 2019 US$ 109.08 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2000s 229.78 real chained 2019 US$ 384.41 real chained 2019 US$ 154.63 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2010s 190.78 real chained 2019 US$ 380.42 real chained 2019 US$ 189.64 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2020s 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ 354.38 real chained 2019 US$ 178.02 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Ecuador or Guyana?
Guyana, at 354.38 real chained 2019 US$ against 176.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Ecuador and Guyana?
178.03 real chained 2019 US$, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guyana?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Guyana rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Ecuador ranks 13th and Guyana ranks 11th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Guyana: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/guyana/">Ecuador vs Guyana: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.