Congo vs Togo: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Congo
7.14 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Togo
5.6 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
57th
Togo rank
59th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Congo
  • Togo
051015199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Togo, a difference of 1.54 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Togo's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 57th and Togo ranks 59th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 14.05 real chained 2019 US$ 8.81 real chained 2019 US$ 5.24 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 11.1 real chained 2019 US$ 7.26 real chained 2019 US$ 3.84 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 8.03 real chained 2019 US$ 6.23 real chained 2019 US$ 1.8 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ 5.6 real chained 2019 US$ 1.54 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Congo or Togo?
Congo, at 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Togo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Congo and Togo?
1.54 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Togo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Togo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Congo ranks 57th and Togo ranks 59th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Togo: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/togo/">Congo vs Togo: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.