Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Congo
7.14 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
7.58 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
57th
South Africa rank
56th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
051015199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 7.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 0.44 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 57th and South Africa ranks 56th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 14.05 real chained 2019 US$ 9.54 real chained 2019 US$ 4.51 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 11.1 real chained 2019 US$ 8.93 real chained 2019 US$ 2.17 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 8.03 real chained 2019 US$ 8.07 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0439 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ 7.58 real chained 2019 US$ 0.435 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Congo or South Africa?
South Africa, at 7.58 real chained 2019 US$ against 7.14 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Congo and South Africa?
0.44 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Congo ranks 57th and South Africa ranks 56th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.