Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Brazil
99.65 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
101.78 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
24th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
23rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Brazil
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 101.78 real chained 2019 US$ against 99.65 real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 2.13 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 127.07 real chained 2019 US$ 124.23 real chained 2019 US$ 2.84 real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2000s 114.37 real chained 2019 US$ 117.36 real chained 2019 US$ 2.99 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 103.04 real chained 2019 US$ 107.43 real chained 2019 US$ 4.38 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 99.65 real chained 2019 US$ 101.78 real chained 2019 US$ 2.12 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Brazil or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 101.78 real chained 2019 US$ against 99.65 real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.13 real chained 2019 US$, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Brazil ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-mangroves-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/trinidad-and-tobago/">Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.