Sudan vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Sudan
0.5512 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
0 current US$
in 2020
Sudan rank
63rd
Zambia rank
64th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.5512 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 0.5512 current US$.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.49 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 2.49 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.5512 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.5512 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 0.5512 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Sudan and Zambia?
- 0.5512 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Sudan ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 64th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.