Peru vs Tanzania: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Peru
4.1 current US$
in 2020
Tanzania
6.11 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
60th
Tanzania rank
59th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Peru
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 6.11 current US$ against 4.1 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 2.01 current US$.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.5 times Peru's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 150 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1476 current US$ | 1.6 current US$ | 1.45 current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0.2103 current US$ | 2.47 current US$ | 2.26 current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 1.25 current US$ | 4.27 current US$ | 3.02 current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 4.1 current US$ | 6.11 current US$ | 2.01 current US$ | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Peru or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 6.11 current US$ against 4.1 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Peru and Tanzania?
- 2.01 current US$, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Tanzania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Peru ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.