Peru vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Peru
4.1 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
60th
Serbia rank
63rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 4.1 current US$.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2793 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.2793 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 1.25 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 4.1 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Peru and Serbia?
- 4.1 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Peru ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.