Pakistan vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Pakistan
1.65 current US$
in 2020
Peru
4.1 current US$
in 2020
Pakistan rank
62nd
Peru rank
61st
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Pakistan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.1 current US$ against 1.65 current US$ in Pakistan, a difference of 2.45 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 2.5 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.31 current US$ | 0.1476 current US$ | 1.16 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 1.51 current US$ | 0.2103 current US$ | 1.3 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 2.36 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | 1.11 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.65 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | 2.45 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Pakistan or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.1 current US$ against 1.65 current US$ in Pakistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Pakistan and Peru?
- 2.45 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Pakistan ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.