Mozambique vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Mozambique
16.25 current US$
in 2020
Singapore
20.75 current US$
in 2020
Mozambique rank
47th
Singapore rank
44th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Mozambique
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 20.75 current US$ against 16.25 current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 4.5 current US$.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Singapore ahead.
Mozambique ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.2 current US$ | 7.55 current US$ | 1.36 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2000s | 7.89 current US$ | 7.9 current US$ | 0.0091 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2010s | 14.42 current US$ | 12.02 current US$ | 2.4 current US$ | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 16.25 current US$ | 20.75 current US$ | 4.5 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Mozambique or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 20.75 current US$ against 16.25 current US$ in Mozambique as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Mozambique and Singapore?
- 4.5 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mozambique and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Mozambique ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.