Lesotho vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Lesotho
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
4.1 current US$
in 2020
Lesotho rank
63rd
Peru rank
60th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Lesotho
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 4.1 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 60th of 150 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0.1476 current US$ | 0.1476 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0.2103 current US$ | 0.2103 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Lesotho or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Lesotho and Peru?
- 4.1 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Lesotho ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 60th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.