Guinea vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Guinea
65.87 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
74.92 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
34th
Malaysia rank
31st
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Guinea
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 74.92 current US$ against 65.87 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 9.05 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.94 current US$ | 71.5 current US$ | 64.56 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 8.48 current US$ | 71.97 current US$ | 63.5 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 26.88 current US$ | 83.05 current US$ | 56.17 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 65.87 current US$ | 74.92 current US$ | 9.05 current US$ | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Guinea or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 74.92 current US$ against 65.87 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Guinea and Malaysia?
- 9.05 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Guinea ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.