Guinea-Bissau vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Guinea-Bissau
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
4.1 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
64th
Peru rank
61st
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 4.1 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0.1476 current US$ | 0.1476 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0.2103 current US$ | 0.2103 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | 1.25 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | 4.1 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Guinea-Bissau or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.1 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Guinea-Bissau and Peru?
- 4.1 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and Peru ranks 61st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.