El Salvador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
El Salvador
8.61 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
8.29 current US$
in 2020
El Salvador rank
55th
South Africa rank
56th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- El Salvador
- South Africa
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 8.61 current US$ against 8.29 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 0.32 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 56th of 151 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.58 current US$ | 0.0332 current US$ | 3.55 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 5.52 current US$ | 0.0413 current US$ | 5.48 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 7.42 current US$ | 3 current US$ | 4.42 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 8.61 current US$ | 8.29 current US$ | 0.3239 current US$ | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, El Salvador or South Africa?
- El Salvador, at 8.61 current US$ against 8.29 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between El Salvador and South Africa?
- 0.32 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- El Salvador ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 56th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.