Ecuador vs Jamaica: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Ecuador
202.01 current US$
in 2020
Jamaica
337.32 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Jamaica rank
10th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Ecuador
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 337.32 current US$ against 202.01 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 135.31 current US$.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.7 times Ecuador's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 151 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.2 current US$ | 309.07 current US$ | 256.88 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 47.25 current US$ | 345.01 current US$ | 297.76 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 94.12 current US$ | 401.88 current US$ | 307.76 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 202.01 current US$ | 337.32 current US$ | 135.31 current US$ | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Ecuador or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 337.32 current US$ against 202.01 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Ecuador and Jamaica?
- 135.31 current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jamaica?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Jamaica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.