Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Costa Rica
77.4 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
74.92 current US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
30th
Malaysia rank
31st
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Costa Rica
- Malaysia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 77.4 current US$ against 74.92 current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 2.48 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malaysia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.32 current US$ | 71.5 current US$ | 52.18 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 18.95 current US$ | 71.97 current US$ | 53.03 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 48.71 current US$ | 83.05 current US$ | 34.34 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 77.4 current US$ | 74.92 current US$ | 2.48 current US$ | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Costa Rica or Malaysia?
- Costa Rica, at 77.4 current US$ against 74.92 current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Costa Rica and Malaysia?
- 2.48 current US$, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Costa Rica ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.