Congo vs Tanzania: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves

Congo
7.25 current US$
in 2020
Tanzania
6.11 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
56th
Tanzania rank
59th

Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania
02468199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 7.25 current US$ against 6.11 current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 1.14 current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tanzania ahead.

Congo ranks 56th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 1.6 current US$ 1.6 current US$ Tanzania
2000s 0 current US$ 2.47 current US$ 2.47 current US$ Tanzania
2010s 2.99 current US$ 4.27 current US$ 1.28 current US$ Tanzania
2020s 7.25 current US$ 6.11 current US$ 1.14 current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Congo or Tanzania?
Congo, at 7.25 current US$ against 6.11 current US$ in Tanzania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Congo and Tanzania?
1.14 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
Congo ranks 56th and Tanzania ranks 59th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed