Congo vs El Salvador: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Congo
7.25 current US$
in 2020
El Salvador
8.61 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
57th
El Salvador rank
55th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Congo
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 8.61 current US$ against 7.25 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 1.36 current US$.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 55th of 151 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 3.58 current US$ | 3.58 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 5.52 current US$ | 5.52 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2.99 current US$ | 7.42 current US$ | 4.43 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 7.25 current US$ | 8.61 current US$ | 1.36 current US$ | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Congo or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 8.61 current US$ against 7.25 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Congo and El Salvador?
- 1.36 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Congo ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 55th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.