Cameroon vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Cameroon
80.3 current US$
in 2020
Costa Rica
77.4 current US$
in 2020
Cameroon rank
27th
Costa Rica rank
30th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Cameroon
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 80.3 current US$ against 77.4 current US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 2.9 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Cameroon ranks 27th and Costa Rica ranks 30th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.65 current US$ | 19.32 current US$ | 7.67 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 11.42 current US$ | 18.95 current US$ | 7.52 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 26.62 current US$ | 48.71 current US$ | 22.09 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 80.3 current US$ | 77.4 current US$ | 2.9 current US$ | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Cameroon or Costa Rica?
- Cameroon, at 80.3 current US$ against 77.4 current US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Cameroon and Costa Rica?
- 2.9 current US$, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Costa Rica?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Cameroon and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Cameroon ranks 27th and Costa Rica ranks 30th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.