Australia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Australia
4,846 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
20,394 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
Suriname rank
1st
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Australia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 20,394 current US$ against 4,846 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 15,548 current US$.
That makes Suriname's figure about 4.2 times Australia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,262 current US$ | 5,494 current US$ | 4,233 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,432 current US$ | 10,048 current US$ | 8,616 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2,913 current US$ | 20,449 current US$ | 17,536 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 4,846 current US$ | 20,394 current US$ | 15,548 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Australia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 20,394 current US$ against 4,846 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Australia and Suriname?
- 15,548 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.