Australia vs St. Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Australia
4,846 current US$
in 2020
St. Lucia
4,210 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
St. Lucia rank
3rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Australia
- St. Lucia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 4,846 current US$ against 4,210 current US$ in St. Lucia, a difference of 636 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times St. Lucia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 2nd and St. Lucia ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | St. Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,262 current US$ | 18.54 current US$ | 1,243 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 1,432 current US$ | 33.4 current US$ | 1,399 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 2,913 current US$ | 1,252 current US$ | 1,661 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 4,846 current US$ | 4,210 current US$ | 636.18 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Australia or St. Lucia?
- Australia, at 4,846 current US$ against 4,210 current US$ in St. Lucia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Australia and St. Lucia?
- 636 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and St. Lucia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and St. Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Australia ranks 2nd and St. Lucia ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.