Australia vs Belize: Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves
Australia
4,846 current US$
in 2020
Belize
1,222 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
Belize rank
5th
Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves over time
- Australia
- Belize
How they compare
Australia currently reports 4,846 current US$ against 1,222 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 3,624 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 4.0 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belize ahead.
Australia ranks 2nd and Belize ranks 5th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Belize in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belize | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,262 current US$ | 1,600 current US$ | 338.19 current US$ | Belize |
| 2000s | 1,432 current US$ | 1,426 current US$ | 6.07 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 2,913 current US$ | 1,278 current US$ | 1,635 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 4,846 current US$ | 1,222 current US$ | 3,624 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves, Australia or Belize?
- Australia, at 4,846 current US$ against 1,222 current US$ in Belize as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves between Australia and Belize?
- 3,624 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belize?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Belize rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Belize ranks 5th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, mangroves (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.