Peru vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
Peru
1,309 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,510 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
21st
Zambia rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- Peru
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1,510 current US$ against 1,309 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 201 current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 377.07 current US$ | 1,157 current US$ | 780.03 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 518.43 current US$ | 1,191 current US$ | 672.18 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,025 current US$ | 1,702 current US$ | 677.18 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,309 current US$ | 1,510 current US$ | 200.98 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, Peru or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1,510 current US$ against 1,309 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between Peru and Zambia?
- 201 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- Peru ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.