Mali vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
Mali
123.18 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
144.49 current US$
in 2020
Mali rank
66th
Sri Lanka rank
64th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 144.49 current US$ against 123.18 current US$ in Mali, a difference of 21.31 current US$.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 111 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.99 current US$ | 186.21 current US$ | 155.21 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 33.72 current US$ | 141.05 current US$ | 107.33 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 84.41 current US$ | 216.16 current US$ | 131.76 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 123.18 current US$ | 144.49 current US$ | 21.31 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 144.49 current US$ against 123.18 current US$ in Mali as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 21.31 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- Mali ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.