Guinea vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
Guinea
70.86 current US$
in 2020
Malawi
77.38 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
71st
Malawi rank
70th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 77.38 current US$ against 70.86 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 6.52 current US$.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 71st and Malawi ranks 70th of 111 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.57 current US$ | 11.34 current US$ | 42.23 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 49.57 current US$ | 6.82 current US$ | 42.75 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 89.76 current US$ | 70.16 current US$ | 19.6 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 70.86 current US$ | 77.38 current US$ | 6.52 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, Guinea or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 77.38 current US$ against 70.86 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between Guinea and Malawi?
- 6.52 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- Guinea ranks 71st and Malawi ranks 70th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.