Ecuador vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
Ecuador
1,476 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,510 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
19th
Zambia rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- Ecuador
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1,510 current US$ against 1,476 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 34 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 1,157 current US$ | 1,157 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 656.24 current US$ | 1,191 current US$ | 534.37 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,036 current US$ | 1,702 current US$ | 666.1 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,476 current US$ | 1,510 current US$ | 34.14 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, Ecuador or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1,510 current US$ against 1,476 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between Ecuador and Zambia?
- 34 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.