China vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
China
606.1 current US$
in 2020
Congo
517.88 current US$
in 2020
China rank
35th
Congo rank
36th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- China
- Congo
How they compare
China currently reports 606.1 current US$ against 517.88 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 88.22 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
China ranks 35th and Congo ranks 36th of 111 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.79 current US$ | 270.68 current US$ | 197.89 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 84.1 current US$ | 266.43 current US$ | 182.33 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 474.97 current US$ | 676.73 current US$ | 201.76 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 606.1 current US$ | 517.88 current US$ | 88.22 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, China or Congo?
- China, at 606.1 current US$ against 517.88 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between China and Congo?
- 88.22 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- China ranks 35th and Congo ranks 36th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.