Chile vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy
Chile
1,717 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,510 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Zambia rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy over time
- Chile
- Zambia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,717 current US$ against 1,510 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 207 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 136.46 current US$ | 1,157 current US$ | 1,021 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 1,840 current US$ | 1,191 current US$ | 649.7 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,097 current US$ | 1,702 current US$ | 394.91 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,717 current US$ | 1,510 current US$ | 206.78 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy, Chile or Zambia?
- Chile, at 1,717 current US$ against 1,510 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy between Chile and Zambia?
- 207 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy?
- Chile ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 18th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, hydropower energy (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.