Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Thailand
362.46 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
340.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Thailand rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Thailand
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 362.46 real chained 2019 US$ against 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 21.94 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Thailand ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 408.74 real chained 2019 US$ 498.54 real chained 2019 US$ 89.8 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 387.73 real chained 2019 US$ 454.8 real chained 2019 US$ 67.07 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 373.08 real chained 2019 US$ 387.32 real chained 2019 US$ 14.25 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 362.46 real chained 2019 US$ 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ 21.94 real chained 2019 US$ Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
Thailand, at 362.46 real chained 2019 US$ against 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
21.94 real chained 2019 US$, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Thailand ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/thailand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/thailand/zimbabwe/">Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed