Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Sao Tome and Principe
3.6 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Singapore
11.7 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe rank
142nd
Singapore rank
140th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Singapore
5101520199520072020

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 11.7 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 8.1 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 140th of 151 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 6.45 real chained 2019 US$ 18.53 real chained 2019 US$ 12.08 real chained 2019 US$ Singapore
2000s 5.55 real chained 2019 US$ 17.02 real chained 2019 US$ 11.47 real chained 2019 US$ Singapore
2010s 4.24 real chained 2019 US$ 13.09 real chained 2019 US$ 8.86 real chained 2019 US$ Singapore
2020s 3.6 real chained 2019 US$ 11.7 real chained 2019 US$ 8.1 real chained 2019 US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Sao Tome and Principe or Singapore?
Singapore, at 11.7 real chained 2019 US$ against 3.6 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
8.1 real chained 2019 US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 140th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/sao-tome-and-principe/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/sao-tome-and-principe/singapore/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed