Russian Federation vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Russian Federation
1,698 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
1,620 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Russian Federation rank
11th
Suriname rank
12th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Suriname
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1,698 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,620 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 78 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 11th and Suriname ranks 12th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 1,655 real chained 2019 US$ 2,196 real chained 2019 US$ 540.74 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 1,704 real chained 2019 US$ 1,941 real chained 2019 US$ 236.54 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 1,709 real chained 2019 US$ 1,725 real chained 2019 US$ 16.08 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 1,698 real chained 2019 US$ 1,620 real chained 2019 US$ 78.34 real chained 2019 US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Russian Federation or Suriname?
Russian Federation, at 1,698 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,620 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Russian Federation and Suriname?
78 real chained 2019 US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Russian Federation and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Russian Federation ranks 11th and Suriname ranks 12th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/russian-federation/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/russian-federation/suriname/">Russian Federation vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed